Former federal judge: Trump’s violation of 14th amendment ‘couldn’t be any clearer’

The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, which was adopted following the Civil War to address issues related to slavery, contains several provisions related to citizenship and voting rights. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment states that “No person shall…formerly hold any office…which had been filled by election or appointment.” This clause has been interpreted by some as potentially barring individuals who have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States from holding public office.

Former President Trump’s role in inciting the January 6th Capitol riots has led to calls for his disqualification from future office under this provision. However, there are significant legal and constitutional questions surrounding such an interpretation. For one, the 14th Amendment does not explicitly define what constitutes “rebellion or insurrection” and there is no established precedent for its application in this context. Additionally, the Supreme Court has historically been reluctant to interpret the 14th Amendment beyond its original intended purpose.

In conclusion, while some argue that Trump’s actions on January 6th could disqualify him from future office under the 14th Amendment, others question whether this interpretation would be legally valid or consistent with historical precedents. The issue remains highly contested and uncertain.

P.S. Don’t forget to vote in the upcoming elections. Voting is your right and responsibility as a citizen. Make your voice heard!