1. The case seemed to hinge on one question: Did Trump know about the alleged fraudulent activity? If he did, he could be held liable. If not, the defendants could walk away scot-free.
2. The defense team argued that Trump was just a figurehead, and that the real decisions were made by others. This suggests that they’re trying to distance him from the alleged fraud.
3. Prosecutors focused on Trump’s role as a businessman and how his aggressive tactics may have led to the alleged fraud. They also tried to paint him as someone who knew exactly what was going on but chose to look the other way.
It’s worth noting that even if Trump is found guilty, there’s no guarantee he’ll face any consequences. He could simply move on to another venture and continue his pattern of behavior. However, if he loses, it could have significant ramifications for his political future. It would show that he can’t be trusted with money and that he puts himself above others. This could damage his reputation and make it harder for him to raise funds for future campaigns.
On the other hand, if he wins, it sends a message that wealthy individuals like Trump can get away with whatever they want. In either scenario, the outcome of this trial will likely have lasting effects on both Trump and the American public.
In conclusion, the closing statements in Trump’s fraud trial provided some interesting insights into the minds of both prosecutors and defense attorneys. Ultimately, the jury will decide whether or not Trump was involved in the alleged fraud. Regardless of the verdict, though, the case has already raised important questions about the role of wealth and power in our society.
Sources & references:
– https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/three-takeaways-dramatic-day-closing-statements-trumps-fraud/story?id=75104372
– https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/26/politics/donald-trump-fraud-trial-what-to-know/index.html
– https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/02/26/donald-trump-fraud-trial-explained/
– https://www.npr.org