During the closing arguments in Trump’s civil fraud trial, attorneys from both sides passionately presented their cases to the judge. The prosecution argued that Trump had knowingly made false statements in order to deceive investors, while his defense team claimed that he had been misled by others and had no intention of defrauding anyone. Tensions ran high in the courtroom as each side accused the other of presenting misleading evidence and engaging in character assassination. Ultimately, the outcome of the trial would come down to the judge’s interpretation of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses presented by both parties. No matter the result, the case was expected to have significant implications for Trump’s reputation and potential future legal battles.